Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Selected Filipino Surgeons Regarding the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Isolated Mandibular Body Fractures In Adults

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v41i1.2873

Keywords:

mandibular fractures, maxillofacial injuries, practice guideline, self-administered questionnaire, otolaryngologists, general surgeons

Abstract

Objectives: To initially assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of selected target users of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Isolated Mandibular Body Fractures in Adults nationwide. Specifically, to assess the level of awareness of selected Filipino surgeons who are expected to use this clinical practice guideline and to identify gaps in knowledge and practices among these surgeons using the key action statements in the clinical practice guideline.

Methods:
Design: Cross-Sectional Study
Setting: Platform-Based Online Survey
Participants: 295 Otorhinolaryngologists – Head and Neck surgeons (ORL-HNS)/Craniomaxillofacial surgeons (CMFS) and General surgeons (GS) / Plastic and Reconstructive surgeons (PRS) consultants and residents/fellows-in-training

Results: Among 295 surgeon respondents (47.46% ORL-HNS consultants), 75.25% were aware of PACMFS guidelines. In general, knowledge scores were high [median (IQR): 12 (11–13) vs 11 (IQR 9–13), U = 11726, n1= 204, n2 = 91, p < .001; Mann-Whitney], with >90% accuracy for the tongue blade test (93.22%), non-contrast CT for fracture assessment (95.93%), closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation for favorable fractures (98.31%), and ORIF with plates and screws for unstable fractures (98.64%); lower accuracy was observed for imaging modality sequencing (50.85%) and antibiotic selection (penicillin - 70.41%). Consultants and ORL-HNS/CMFS specialists demonstrated significantly higher knowledge and were guideline-concordant than trainees and other specialties. Attitudes toward multidisciplinary collaboration, evidence based practice updates, and cost-effectiveness were nearly universal (over 99%). Most self reported practices—such as requesting a panoramic radiograph (68.14%), obtaining plain mandibular radiographs when panoramic imaging was unavailable (91.53%), using Barton’s bandage for temporary immobilization (89.83%), administering prophylactic antibiotics for mucosal/ skin breach (98.31%), and initiating analgesia at 4/10 pain score (85.71%)—were also guideline-consistent.

Conclusion: Filipino surgeons in this survey demonstrated generally strong alignment with the published Philippine Academy of
Craniomaxillofacial Surgery (PACMFS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults,
showing high knowledge and consistent self-reported adherence for key diagnostic steps, imaging selection when resources allow,
temporary stabilization, and definitive operative decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

1.
Edora BD, Lapeña JF. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Selected Filipino Surgeons Regarding the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Isolated Mandibular Body Fractures In Adults. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 21 [cited 2026 May 1];41(1):43. Available from: https://pjohns.pso-hns.org/index.php/pjohns/article/view/2873